Welcome to the new rants
page.
Some subjects in the mountain bike world are a bit
emotive, well Flat Eric likes a good rant and has had one,
read what he has to say below.
THE PRICE OF ELITISM by Flat Eric
Whilst re-immersing myself in the retail minefield of the
Mountain Bike world after a 5 year absence, it was with
some shock that I came to realise a decent quality entry-level
bike would set me back about £400 for starters, rising
rapidly up to £3000 - £4000 for an exotic high
performance full suss beast. I had set myself an arbitrary £400
budget to get back into the sport, and was expecting to
be able to get some mid to high end lightweight XC hardtail
for that. In exasperation I turned to the second-hand market
where I was soon rewarded.
Being a gadget fiend, however,
my head was soon turned by the rows of bright and shiny
things adorning the shelves of the local bike shops; braided
cables, disc brakes, titanium bolts, carbon fibre composite
bar ends, mini multitools, the list goes on and on. It
seemed that, more so than other sports, the steep rise
to the plateau of high performance is an extremely costly
exercise.
Is it really worth paying nearly £300 for a pair of
hydraulic disc brakes, for example? (I use this example as
it is a common, contentious and possibly inflammatory one
to cite).
Do they stop you £300 better than old V-brakes? No
doubt they look great, they demand a joule or two less energy
from your fingers to activate them, they give more pleasing
'feedback' and they clog less in extreme mud. But have you
ever suffered a bad accident due to insufficient operation
of v-brakes that the upgrade to discs could have avoided?
There will no doubt be one rare occasion out of 1000 of us
that might say,"well yes, actually, it has, thank you
for asking." but I'm sure the majority answer will be
negative.
But be warned, if you answer the question "No",
then you are admitting you are not one of the serious contenders
for on-the-extreme-edge riding, those elitist athletes that
can actually appear to justify the high cost of all their
gear, rather than one of the Sunday afternoon wannabees that
is past the age of aspiring to these sorts of dedicated heights.
To be welcomed into this hard-core fold, it can often be
enough to have purchased 'all the right gear', see it as
a basic admission fee to an exclusive club. If it looks the
part and is deemed cool then it can be accepted by the style
priests of the MTB community and is thus well worth justifying
the cost. 'Fashioned from a single billet of Aluminium' is
one of my favourites. Yippee. Where's the test data that
shows it's three times the strength as the ordinary one and
thus three times the cost. There's a pair of bike shoes selling
in the market at the moment using the feature of 'titanium
sole' to justify it. Is there a stiff and lightweight plate
of metal built in for mysterious extra performance? Well
not exactly, but the plastic sole does have titanium dioxide
pigment in it, the standard white pigment used in emulsion
paint, which gives it a greyish colour. Whoopee-do. (Some
golf ball manufacturers also use exactly the same feature
to justify an extra £1.50 cost per box above 'normal'
balls.)
This is an all-too-common ruse used by marketeers
to justify high prices exploiting some basic technical ignorances
of a product-hungry cash-rich customer base. A customer base
that also associates deep technical knowledge of this kind
with the negative connotations of nerd or geekism. They know
one thing many of us don't think about, as it's often taken
for granted; Emotional appeal sells far stronger than rational
appeal. I put it to you, m'lud, that this fact helps to explain
the exorbitant prices of most sexy gear items in the MTB
world. People want to aspire to a perceived elitism by having
the right gear far more than the perceived rational benefit
to their own riding it affords.
If you doubt the power of the emotional over the rational,
look at George W Bush, and the support he rallies in his
own countrymen after the Twin Towers atrocity. There's a
prime example, he's not selling himself on rational ideas
about economy, he's selling himself on fear, fear that the
ordinary American might actually face problems on their own
turf for once or have their beloved lifestyle disrupted (If
the US stopped for a minute to examine the rational side
and what a dreadful state their economy had crept into over
the last few years, he'd be out on his ear immediately).
Luckily for him, the level of his message was pitched just
low enough for the majority of his countrymen to digest.
Back to mountain bikes for a
minute more; Does this appealing to the emotional rather
than the rational side actually matter?
Well not really, the companies will continue selling at the
best price they can get people to buy at. If people have
the money and they perceive the value of the item as good,
it will be sold, and if it makes you feel good, then you're
happy with it. Indeed some items sell better because of the
perceived quality, an Omega watch tells exactly the same
time as a Swatch, but if the Omega was priced at £19.99
you'd think it was a knock off or fake, stolen or about to
break. Halfords bike £159.99, can't be much good for
that. We all do it!
So are you getting good value
for money when you buy expensive upgrade items for your
bike? Will you spend an extra £75
to get a 5 ounce weight saving? (I can save £3.49 and
avoid an extra 2lb weight gain by avoiding Macdonalds a little
more often) No, I don't think you are, I think the prices
are elevated often beyond all proportion by this desire for
elitism, but as long as we all enjoy ourselves in the sport/hobby,
then that has to be the most important thing at the end of
the day. People with cash to burn, carry on buying, and keep
those prices high for the rest of us to suffer!
Next month: Life the universe and spline fettling.
So do you agree
with him, post your opinions in the accompanying forum
thread, follow this link...
Have any news to report, e-mail it
to us using the address below.
|